Yes, but it takes a very long time.
Chat with our AI personalities
No, rock is not considered renewable because it takes millions of years to form through geological processes like cooling magma or compression of sediments. Once rocks are extracted and used, they cannot be quickly replenished like renewable resources such as solar or wind energy.
No, rock is not a renewable resource because it takes millions of years for rocks to form through geological processes. Once rocks are mined or extracted, they cannot be easily replaced within a human lifetime.
Marble is considered a non-renewable resource because it is a type of rock that is formed over long periods of time through natural geological processes. Once it is mined and used, it cannot be easily replaced within a human lifetime.
I think it's not renewable because if we use all the limestone in the world we wont have any left to know how to make it on our own, but it may be renewable cause it is made from our planet Earth. +++ I'm not sure I can follow that first answer. It is not renewable. Although new limestone is being formed in various places around the world, the rate of deposition and lithification, let alone uplift, is far lower than that of our removal of existing rock.
No, pumice is a volcanic rock that is not renewable in the short term.
Potash is considered a nonrenewable resource because it is mined from underground mineral deposits that have accumulated over millions of years. Once these deposits are depleted, it can take a significant amount of time for them to be replenished naturally.