correct.
feedback inhibition
In microeconomics, a production function asserts that the maximum output of a technologically-determined production process is a mathematical production of input factors of production. Considering the set of all technically feasible combinations of output and inputs, only the combinations encompassing a maximum output for a specified set of inputs would constitute the production function. Alternatively, a production function can be defined as the specification of the minimum input requirements needed to produce designated quantities of output, given available technology. It is usually presumed that unique production functions can be constructed for every production technology. By assuming that the maximum output technologically possible from a given set of inputs is achieved, economists using a production function in analysis are abstracting away from the engineering and managerial problems inherently associated with a particular production process. The engineering and managerial problems of technical efficiency are assumed to be solved, so that analysis can focus on the problems of allocative efficiency. The firm is assumed to be making allocative choices concerning how much of each input factor to use, given the price of the factor and the technological determinants represented by the production function. A decision frame, in which one or more inputs are held constant, may be used; for example, capital may be assumed to be fixed or constant in the short run, and only labour variable, while in the long run, both capital and labour factors are variable, but the production function itself remains fixed, while in the very long run, the firm may face even a choice of technologies, represented by various, possible production functions. The relationship of output to inputs is non-monetary, that is, a production function relates physical inputs to physical outputs, and prices and costs are not considered. But, the production function is not a full model of the production process: it deliberately abstracts away from essential and inherent aspects of physical production processes, including error, entropy or waste. Moreover, production functions do not ordinarily model the business processes, either, ignoring the role of management, of sunk cost investments and the relation of fixed overhead to variable costs. (For a primer on the fundamental elements of microeconomic production theory, see production theory basics). The primary purpose of the production function is to address allocative efficiency in the use of factor inputs in production and the resulting distribution of income to those factors. Under certain assumptions, the production function can be used to derive a marginal product for each factor, which implies an ideal division of the income generated from output into an income due to each input factor of production.
A monopolist will set production at a level where marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue.
A production possibilities frontier graph
a production possibilities frontier graph
A real-valued function f on an interval (or, more generally, a convex set in vector space) is said to be concave if, for any x and y in the interval and for any t in [0,1],A function is called strictly concave iffor any t in (0,1) and x ≠ y.For a function f:R→R, this definition merely states that for every z between x and y, the point (z, f(z) ) on the graph of f is above the straight line joining the points (x, f(x) ) and (y, f(y) ).A function f(x) is quasiconcave if the upper contour sets of the function are convex sets.
the union of two convex sets need not be a convex set.
Convex function on an open set has no more than one minimum. In demand it shows the elasticity is linear after some point and non linear on other points.
no
yes
The answer depends on how it is halved. If the plane is divided in two by a step graph (a zig-zag line) then it will not be a convex set.
A convex polygon is one with no reflex angles (angles that measure more than 180 degrees when viewed from inside the polygon). More generally a convex set is on where a straight line between any two points in the set lies completely within the set.
Yes.
no, because it should be a segment .
It can be if the set consists of convex shapes, for example.
The closed, or convex, set.
It is extremely difficult. In fact the 15 class of pentagon was only discovered in 2015.All triangles will tessellate. All quadrilaterals will tessellate 15 classes of irregular convex pentagons will tessellate. Regular hexagons will tessellate as will 3 classes of irregular convex hexagons which will tessellate. No convex polygon with 7 or more sides will tessellate.Then, there are concave polygons as well as non-polygonal shapes which will tessellate. One interesting collection of examples is MC Escher's set of symmetric artwork from 1942, mostly watercolours.