They are not, other that the fact that any perfect square is a non-negative and so is also a cube root of some non-negative integer (usually much larger).
But -2 is a cube root (of -8), while -8 is not a perfect square.
The square root of every perfect square is an integer. However, there are also square roots of numbers that are not perfect squares.
Well, let's see. Perfect cubes that are two digits: 27 64 Could it be 27? Well, 2+7 is 9, and that's a perfect square with a square root of 3, and the cube root of 27 is three. Looks like we've found our answer, especially since 6+4 = 10, which is NOT a perfect square.
200 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
345 is not a perfect square and neither is its square root.
30 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
500 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
38 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
A principal square root is any square root that's answer is positive, and a perfect square root is a square root that's answer is an integer.
16 is a perfect square (of 4) and the square root of 256.
Yes it is.Since the square of an integer is called a perfect square, then the square root of a perfect square must be an integer.
A perfect square root is where the square root of a number equals another whole number. For example, the square root of 144 is 12. 12 is a whole number thus 144 is a perfect square root.
Any integer is a perfect square oot (of its square). So 300 is a perfect square root of 90000.