Not quite but very close. If you disassemble a machine code program you do not get the original assembly. Aside from stripping out all comments and variable names, the "structure" of the original assembly is lost. However, if you compare the code side-by-side you will be able to see how similar they actually are and how easy it would be to reverse engineer the code to reproduce a facsimile of the original source code.
Assembly language to machine code translation is a "one to one" translation process, as every individual instruction expressed in the assembly language corresponds to exactly one machine instruction. Note this does not hold for pseudo instructions or expanding macros, which are supported by some assemblers.
I guess you're trying to refer to Assembly language.
Assembly langue is translated into machine language by an assembler.
An Assembler converts assembly language instructions into machine language.
Assembly
Assembly language to machine code translation is a "one to one" translation process, as every individual instruction expressed in the assembly language corresponds to exactly one machine instruction. Note this does not hold for pseudo instructions or expanding macros, which are supported by some assemblers.
I guess you're trying to refer to Assembly language.
Assembly langue is translated into machine language by an assembler.
An Assembler converts assembly language instructions into machine language.
Assembly language is the programming language that always has a one to one correspondence for a line of code in that language and a line of code in machine language
assembler
Assembly
Assembly language is a readable way of representing machine language. It consists of mnemonics that can be directly converted to machine language. Assembly language allows easier jump instructions with the usage of labels which gets converted to real addresses after assembling.
No, they are not the same. Assembly language uses mnemonic words to REPRESENT machine language; to be able to actually run it, a special program - a so-called assembler - then needs to convert it into machine language.
assembly language uses abbreviation called menmonics.it is a bit easier to write computer programs in assembly language as compared to machine language but still requires skill and experienci.A program called assembler is used to convert an assembly language into machine language.
Machine language is the actual instructions in computer memory that are fetched into the processor and executed. It is directly executable and consists of what look to most human beings like a bunch of hexadecimal numbers, though a few geeks such as myself can tell it is code instead of numbers. For example, the instructions executing interrupt 21, service 10, are: B410 CD21 Assembly language is a human readable as mnemonics, it translates on a one for one basis into machine language. The computer cannot execute assembly language directly, but human beings who are trained can understand it. The assembly language equivalent of the above instructions is: MOV AH,10 ; prepare for service 10 by putting 10 into AH INT 21 ; vectors into code established in the interrupt table
Both, compiler and assembler, are software tools which translate instructions written in a programming language into executable machine code. (Both will typically require additional tools, such as a linker, in the process.) An assembler recognizes a machine-specific assembly language. This is a low-level language with a one-to-one relationship between language (assembly) instructions and machine code instructions. A compiler recognizes a generally machine-independent language such as the C programming language. These are higher level languages compared to the assembly languages, generally offering a one-to-many relationship between language instructions and expressions, and the resulting machine code instructions.