Oblique cavalier drawings tend to appear distorted and elongated. They are not considered as true projections despite being dimensionally correct.
False
The presence of an uncontrolled variable might be revealed.a failed simulation does prove something but its limited on what you can prove
A: By applying two known DC input with a known gain the output will be there to prove the difference.
Correct electrode size Correct current Correct arc length Correct travel speed Correct electrode angle 💯
no it can't be
No, not all dimensionally correct equations represent physical relationships. Dimensional analysis focuses on the units of measurements in an equation to ensure consistency but does not guarantee the physical relevance of the relationship itself. It is possible to have dimensionally correct equations that do not have a meaningful physical interpretation.
The correct answer is 'E' This is for Apex users
It is not the entire equation, but for current practical purposes, it is correct. If an object is moving at relativistic speeds, it is not correct. It requires you use relativistic mass, which is based on the velocity relative to the speed of light. It is correct for any human purposes.
it is a scientific equation made my albert einstein It is the Formula for WATER (EMC2)
Real small
Circle.
That is the correct spelling of the verb "prove" (establish as fact).
in 1905
Planck's Constant is dimensionally equal to Angular Momentum. The unit is Joules second.
Oblique cavalier drawings tend to appear distorted and elongated. They are not considered as true projections despite being dimensionally correct.
Albert Einstein