The Existential Quantifier, usually written as a back-to-front capital E indicates the existence of a thing of a certain sort satisfying certain conditions. The Universal Quantifier, usually written as an upside-down capital A, indicates that every thing of a certain sort satisfies those conditions.
Inductive reactance does NOT have it own sign or symbol. Rather, it uses Ohms as a quantifier. But Capacitive reactance ALSO uses Ohms as a quantifier. Fortunately, 1 Ohm of Inductive reactance is cancelled by 1 Ohm of Capacitive reactance at the same frequency of measurement.
that is the point of being universal
Yes. Another name for the Universal Dividing Head is the Universal Indexing Head.
A universal motor is used to operate a food mixer.
A Universal Resource Locator, or URL, is an address to access a specific website or document on the internet.
The shorthand symbol for 'all' is a universal quantifier symbol (∀).
It's a determiner, sometimes a quantifier.
A cardinal number, such as ten, or an ordinal number, such as first.
all, none, some, or not all of something is what your going to deal with mostly. the hardest thing for me is translation into PD (predicate logic). upside down capital A "∀" means for everything in the universe of discourse you are tramslating. example : all Greeks are human (∀x) (Gx > Hx) "for all x, if x is greek, then x is human" this basically means the universe of discourse is Greeks (for all G basically). now this ∀ symbol is called a quantifier. it is a universal quantifier... hence for "ALL" x now there is another quantifier. an existential quantifier. this is different from universal because it is not for every x, it is for AT LEAST ONE (which means there is an x) or not all x. this symbol is a backwards E "∃" example: there is a greek that is human (∃x) (Gx & Hx) "there exists an x, (such that, or and) x is greek and x is human" notice that the universal is a "if, then" or (>) statement and the existential is a "&" statement. for the most part this is how they work but there are some instances were both can be implemented... example: all greek athelete's are human (∀x) (Gx & Ax) > Hx "for all x, if x is a greek and an athelete, then x is a human" this is mostly predicate stuff but hopefully a good start to the harder stuff young blood.
How do you use the WORD AIR? you just say it
To determine if the following two statements mean the same thing, you would need to offer the quantifier sequences. Then, you could compare the sequences to determine if they are the same.
since there isn't much use for quantifiers in English, it maybe a little difficult for you to learn Chinese quantifier words, it takes a rather long time for you to practise and to memorise some rules.
Without seeing the following two statements, one could not say if the two statements mean the same thing. Quantifier sequences are used to specify repetitions of characters in patterns.
Inductive reactance does NOT have it own sign or symbol. Rather, it uses Ohms as a quantifier. But Capacitive reactance ALSO uses Ohms as a quantifier. Fortunately, 1 Ohm of Inductive reactance is cancelled by 1 Ohm of Capacitive reactance at the same frequency of measurement.
Inductive reactance does NOT have it own sign or symbol. Rather, it uses Ohms as a quantifier. But Capacitive reactance ALSO uses Ohms as a quantifier. Fortunately, 1 Ohm of Inductive reactance is cancelled by 1 Ohm of Capacitive reactance at the same frequency of measurement.
Zillions is fictitious number (non-numerical vague quantifier). See related link..
No, the word "both" is not a preposition. It is typically used as a quantifier to refer to two items or people together.