When you use the compact and repair tool, the Auto Number in a table will be reset to one greater than the largest existing AutoNumber value. For example, consider a table with an AutoNumber field that has 10 rows with autonumbered values from 1 to 10. If you delete rows 6, 9, and 10, and then compact and repair the database, the AutoNumber seed will be reset to 9 (1 greater than the maximum AutoNumber value in the table, which in this example is 8). If the table has no data in it, the AutoNumber will be reset to 1.
Chat with our AI personalities
A krishnamurthy number is one whose sum of the factorials of each number is equal to the number itself. Example145sum of factorial of each digits = 1+24+120 = 145 which is the number itself.
Yes, as it is divisible by a number other that 1 and itself (not a prime number).
No 59 is a prime number because only 1 and itself can go into it.
You don't need to make any part of a class private, but then it would behave no differently to a struct, which is public by default. The point of private access is to hide data and methods that are internal to the class; you are not supposed to be able to access them from outside the class. There are three levels of access: private access is only accessible to the class itself, and to friends of the class. Protected access is the same as private, but is also accessible to derived classes. Public access is accessible to all. To give an example, imagine the following structure: struct s { unsigned int num; }; Suppose the num member can be any positive value but must never be zero. That means that whenever we pass this structure to a function, we must assert or verify that num is non-zero. We are relying on those functions to perform verification that should rightly be performed by the structure. But num is public, so there's really no way to safeguard against the structure containing invalid data. So let's replace the structure with a class: class c { public: c():num(1); void setnum(unsigned int number){if(number !=0 ) num = number;} unsigned int getnum()const{return( num );} private: unsigned int num; }; Now we can be sure that num is never zero. The constructor automatically sets num to positive 1, and the setnum mutator only changes num if the given number parameter is non-zero. Meanwhile, the getnum accessor returns a copy of num, not a reference to num. Only the class itself has access to the private num variable, thus the data is hidden from outside influence, and the public interface guarantees that num will always be non-zero. We no longer need to verify this fact because that functionality is encapsulated within the class itself, where it belongs.
Yes. All non-prime numbers are composite numbers, which simply means a number has one or more prime factors other than 1 and the number itself.