answersLogoWhite

0

Balance ideas to promote a positive dialogue and resolve conflict. apex.

User Avatar

Lily Micheal

Lvl 5
5y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How might an academic argument differ from an every day face to face argument particularly if escalated to a heated confrontation?

An academic argument is an argument that is objectively composed and based entirely on facts. An everyday argument is more likely to be emotionally charged (especially in a heated confrontation) and is therefore not like an academic argument.


What are limits in maths?

Limits (or limiting values) are values that a function may approach (but not actually reach) as the argument of the function approaches some given value. The function is usually not defined for that particular value of the argument.


What does it mean to anticipate objections when making an argument?

Anticipating objections means considering potential counterarguments or challenges that others may raise to your argument. By addressing these objections in advance, you can strengthen your argument by acknowledging and countering any potential weaknesses or alternative viewpoints. It demonstrates a thoughtful and thorough approach to persuasion.


What is the best approach for beginning my research paper?

The best approach for beginning a research paper is to start by clearly defining your topic, conducting thorough research, and creating a strong thesis statement that outlines the main argument of your paper.


What makes a good argument according to Toulmin?

According to Toulmin's model of argumentation, a good argument should consist of a claim, evidence to support the claim, reasoning that connects the evidence to the claim, and acknowledgment of potential counterarguments. This structure helps to strengthen the argument and make it more convincing and well-supported.


What type of organization pattern is best when you want to build an argument?

The best organizational pattern for building an argument is the "classical" or "Toulmin" model. This approach typically includes an introduction that presents the claim, followed by supporting evidence, counterarguments, and a rebuttal. By clearly structuring the argument in this way, you can logically persuade your audience and address potential objections. This format helps create a compelling and well-rounded argument.


What does a thesis statement need to be true?

A thesis statement does not necessarily need to be objectively true; rather, it should be a clear and debatable claim that can be supported with evidence and reasoning throughout the essay. It serves as the main point or argument that the writer will develop and explore in the paper.


How is an argument used according to essay logical fallacies?

To persuade your audience that you are correct


What is formal logic?

Formal logic is logic used to examine the form that an argument is presented in. Formal logic looks at the grammar and sentence structure of an argument through a logical approach.


What does it mean to dispute an argument on the basis of the fact?

To dispute an argument on the basis of fact means to challenge the validity of the argument by presenting evidence or data that contradicts the claims being made. This approach focuses on objective information rather than relying solely on opinions or personal beliefs. By using facts as a basis for disputing an argument, one aims to strengthen their position and demonstrate the flaws in the opposing point of view.


What is a persuasive approach?

A persuasive approach is a strategy used to convince or influence someone to adopt a certain belief, attitude, or action. This approach often involves using logic, reasoning, emotions, and evidence to make a compelling argument. It aims to change the opinions or behaviors of others by appealing to their values, interests, or emotions.


Which argument did Abraham Lincoln use against the secession of the south?

I believe one argument he made was that there are no provisions for cessation in the Constitution. One problem with the argument is that according to the Constitution any powers not given to the federal government are reserved to the states.