No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
All trapezoids are also parallelograms.
False but they are both 4 sided quadrilaterals
Yes. To be a trapezoid, a quadrilateral must have one pair of sides that are parallel. Since rhombuses are parallelograms, they are all also trapezoids, so a subset of trapezoids are rhombuses.
No, a quadrilateral isn't always a trapezoid. One way to consider it is that all trapezoids are quadrilaterals (four-sided shapes), but not all quadrilaterals are trapezoids. Some quadrilaterals are concave quadrilaterals, some are scalene convex quadrilaterals (called trapezoids in the UK), some would be trapezoids, and some would be parallelograms (rectangles, squares, rhomboids, rhombi). If parallelograms are considered a special case of trapezoids, then trapezoids would include all non-scalene convex quadrilaterals, which is a highly inclusive definition.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
No. Parallelograms are never trapezoids. Trapezoids are never parallelograms.
No. Trapezoids are not parallelograms at all.
No but all parallelograms are trapezoids
No, but all parallelograms are trapezoids.
All trapezoids are also parallelograms.
never
parallelograms have two sets of parallel lines trapezoids do not
No because all quadrilaterals are 4 sided shapes which includes parallelograms, trapezoids, squares, rectangles, kites......etc
yes