There isn't an answer to the question, and that's the point. Hebb was suggesting that trying to ascribe variation in humans to this much genetics and this much environment is as misguided as trying to ascribe variation in the area of a rectangle to this much length or this much width: it can't be done, because one is as essential as the other and they fundamentally inter-relate.
Same as a rectangle. It is, after all, a type of rectangle (lenght >< width)
Area of a rectangle = lenght x breadth = 27mm x 43mm= 1161 sq.mm
The width of the rectangle will decrease as the length increases .
the perimeter of a rectangle is 700 yards. what are the dimensions of the rectangle if the lenght is 80 yards more than the width?
Yes, the lenght and/or width would have to be 2.5cm by 2cm
No.
Area of a rectangle is width times lenght. 14m in lenght (times) 5m in width = 70m2
A rectangle is a 2 dimensional shape. It can have no mass.
Same as a rectangle. It is, after all, a type of rectangle (lenght >< width)
a square
k
135 sq ft
A rectangle
Area of a rectangle = lenght x breadth = 27mm x 43mm= 1161 sq.mm
The width of the rectangle will decrease as the length increases .
You divide the perimeter by the width and you get the lenght
Length times width. A rectangle requires four sides with opposite sides being parallel and of the same lenght.