A parallelogram cannot be generalised to a convex shape with an odd number of sides.
a parrollellogram * * * * * No, a parrollollogram - or even a parallelogram - is not a 3d shape! The correct answer is a tetrahedron or a triangle based pyramid.
convex
convex
It is not a 3D shape.
Parallelogram bc the ends are slanted
A parallelogram need not be a square, it need not be a rhombus but it is a convex shape.
If you put two of ANY triangle hypotenuse to hypotenuse the shape will have 4 sides (thus a parallelogram or quadrilateral).
If you take a right triangle and move it to the right of a parallelogram, it creates a trapezium.
it just doesnt exist. parallelogram is a closed shape vth opposite sides parallel adjacent angle not 90 degree. triangle is closed shape vth 3 sides.
A closed, convex, plane (2-dimensional) shape.
The only convex polygon that is rigid is a triangle.
Yes, it is! I had this question last night on an assignment for school, and "googled" it because I didn't really know, but yes, it is convex.
It depends on the shape - triangle, parallelogram etc.
by 1 parallelogram and a triangle
It depends on the shape. A triangle and a parallelogram with these dimensions will have different areas.
... and the shape is? A triangle? A parallelogram?
A convex shape is a shape that is pushing out like a house -> /\ <- |_|