Yes, if they are a square.
A square is always a rhombus, but a rhombus is notalways a square.
Yes, a square is a more specific geometric shape than a Rhombus. A square is always a Rhombus, but a Rhombus isn't always a square.
If it's a rhombus and not a square. I fail to see the difficulty here. Every square is a rhombus, but not every rhombus is a square.
A rhombus is sometimes a square but a square is always a rhombus. A square is a rhombus with all angles equal to 90 degrees.
A square is technically a rhombus - but a rhombus is never a square. The definition of a rhombus is that it has two pairsof parallel sides. A square is defined as having all foursides equal,
Yes, if they are a square.
Yes - more than can, all squares arerhombuses:A rhombus is a quadrilateral with opposite sides equal and parallel.A square is a quadrilateral that has opposite sides equal and parallel.Thus a square is a rhombus.
well a rhombus a little look at the left bottom of it that;S the differnt thing about it
A square is always a rhombus, but a rhombus is notalways a square.
A square is always a rhombus, but a rhombus is notalways a square.
No, a rhombus that isn't a square will never have perpendicular sides, but its diagonals are perpendicular inasmuch that they intersect each other at right angles.
no a square is not a rhombus
no a square is not a rhombus
A rhombus is a tetragon (or quadrilateral, what ever you want to call it) has two sets of parallel lines, all which are the same length. A square fits the above description, therefore, a square is a rhombus. For a two dimentional object to be square, it must fit the descriptions for the rhombus as well as have 4 right angles.
FALSE a square is a rhombus but a rhombus is not a square
Rhombus Not a SquareIn a square, the sides are perpendicular. In a rhombus, they aren't. A rhombus is never a square.