0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Maxine
Lao
EzraAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does it mean to prove that two figures are congruent using rigid motions?
Proving that two figures are congruent using rigid motions involves demonstrating that one figure can be transformed into the other through a series of translations, rotations, and reflections without changing the size or shape of the original figure. This proof relies on the principle that rigid motions preserve distance and angle measures. By showing that the corresponding parts of the two figures align perfectly after applying these transformations, it can be concluded that the figures are congruent.
Is cone curvilinear or rectilinear?
Curvilinear seems to fit the description of a cone
Is a pentagon shape in a pentagon shape a rigid shape?
yes a pentagon is a rigid shape * * * * * I am afraid that it is not.
Which transformation is not a rigid transformation?
A rigid transformation means it has the same size and shape so it would be a dilation
What makes square and hexagon rigid?
Neither a square nor a hexagon are rigid so the question is misguided. Any square can be "squashed" into a rhombus and a hexagon into an irregular hexagon. The only rigid polygon is a triangle.
