answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What type of thinking involves forming general conclusions based on observations of specific examples?

Inductive


What is the difference between deduction and induction in reasoning and how do they differ in terms of their approach to forming conclusions?

Deduction involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, using logical reasoning. Induction, on the other hand, involves forming general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. Deduction starts with a general statement and applies it to specific cases, while induction starts with specific observations and generalizes to form a conclusion.


How deductive and inductive reasoning are the same?

Deductive and inductive reasoning are both methods of logical thinking used to draw conclusions. They both involve making observations, forming hypotheses, and reaching conclusions based on evidence. However, deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general conclusions.


This is the process of forming a specific consequence from general observations?

The process you're describing is called induction - it involves drawing conclusions based on patterns or observations, often using specific instances to reach a broader generalization or hypothesis. By observing multiple instances and identifying commonalities, one can infer a specific consequence that applies more broadly than the original observations.


What is the difference between deduction and induction in reasoning and how do they each contribute to forming conclusions?

Deduction involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, while induction involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or evidence. Deduction is used to ensure logical validity in reasoning, while induction is used to make generalizations based on patterns or trends. Both deduction and induction play important roles in forming conclusions by providing different ways to reason and make sense of information.


Which is the best description of inductive thinking?

Inductive thinking involves making generalizations based on specific observations or examples. It involves moving from specific instances to broad generalizations without guaranteeing the truth of the conclusion.


How does behavioral observation differ from judgements?

Behavioral observation involves objectively watching and recording behaviors, while judgments involve forming opinions or conclusions about someone based on those observations. Observations focus on specific behaviors and are typically measurable, while judgments can be subjective and influenced by personal biases or beliefs.


Advantages and disadvantages of inductive reasoning?

Inductive reasoning involves forming generalizations based on specific observations. An advantage is its flexibility and ability to generate new hypotheses or theories. However, a disadvantage is its susceptibility to biases, as the conclusions drawn may not always be accurate or reliable.


What is the steps of the inductive reasoning process?

Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations. The steps typically involve making observations, identifying patterns, forming a hypothesis, and then testing the hypothesis through additional observations or experiments to determine if the generalization holds true. It is important to note that inductive reasoning does not guarantee certainty, but rather provides probable conclusions based on the evidence at hand.


When you form general ideas and rules based on your experience and oberservations you call that form of reasoning?

Forming conclusions based on experience and observations is called inductive reasoning


True or false induction it a kind of thinking of thinking you use to form general ideas and rules based on mathrmatical formulas?

False. Induction is a method of reasoning used to form general conclusions based on specific observations or examples, not just mathematical formulas. In mathematics, mathematical induction is a specific technique used to prove statements about natural numbers, but the broader concept of induction applies to forming general ideas from empirical evidence across various fields.


What type of reasoning do scientists use when looking at problems?

Scientists use deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning when looking at problems. Deductive reasoning involves making specific conclusions based on general principles or theories. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations or theories based on specific observations or evidence. Both types of reasoning are important in forming hypotheses, making predictions, and drawing conclusions in scientific research.