area of rectangle = l * b area = 8 * 5 =40 m ^2 ( 1 m=100 cm 500cm= 5 m)
No. 2m is only 200cm.
It is smaller, as it is only 5.36m, so it is 10 times smaller.
as this question is continuation of another question....so usin results of previous question that is 12m = 1200 cm 1200cm / 30 cm = 40 1:40 so we can write 95cm * 40 = 3800 cm 3800 cm = 38 m (which is the required answer) by Hanny Tufail hanny.tufail@gmail.com
No.Finding an obtuse triangle that does not have a greater area than any acute triangle will show the statement is false:Consider the obtuse triangle with sides 25, 25, 40 cm; andthe acute triangles with sides 2, 2, 2 cm and 40, 40, 40 cmArea of (A) obtuse triangle = 40 x 12 ÷ 2 = 240 cm2Area of (B) acute 2, 2, 2 cm triangle = 2 x √3 ÷ 2 = √3 cm2 ~= 1.7 cm2Area of (C) acute 40, 40, 40 cm triangle = 40 x (20 x √3) ÷ 2 = 400 x √3 cm2 ~= 692.8 cm2So you can clearly see that area of acute triangle (C) is greater than that of obtuse triangle (B) which is greater than acute triangle (A).Thus the area of obtuse triangle (B) is not greater than that of any acute triangle.(Obtuse triangle A has angles approx 37o, 37o, 106o, whereas triangles B and C are equilateral acute triangles with angles 60o, 60o, 60o.)
I think they are equal
40 m is larger than 400 cm.40 m is equal to 4000 cm which is greater than 400 cm. 400 cm is only equal to 4 m.
0.06 m is greater than 0.001 cm
1 m = 100 cm So 40 m = 4000 cm
1.5 m is greater than 145 cm which equals 1.45 m
It is 1.5 m because 145 cm = 1.45 m1.5 m equals 150 cm which is greater than 145 cm
The centi- prefix means one hundredth → 1 cm = 1/100 m → 40 cm = 40 × 1/100 m = 0.4 m → 52 m 40 cm = 52 m + 0.4 m = 52.4 m
4 m. 40 cm equals 0.4 m.
A meter (m) is greater than a centimeter (cm). This is because a meter is the base unit of length in the metric system, equal to 100 centimeters. Therefore, 1 meter is equivalent to 100 centimeters, making a meter greater in length than a centimeter.
40dm
40
M (meter) is 100 times greater than cm (centimeter).