An enlargement.
Reflecting
translation
Reflection
No, isometric transformations do not change the size of shapes. They preserve distances and angles, meaning that the original shape and its image after the transformation will have the same dimensions. Examples of isometric transformations include translations, rotations, and reflections, which maintain the object's size and shape.
A isometry is a transformation where distance (aka size) is preserved. In a dilation, the size is being altered, so no, it is not an isometry.
An asymmetric enlargement. A convolution, Fourier transformation, for example.
Reflecting
The question asks about the "following". In those circumstances would it be too much to expect that you make sure that there is something that is following?
I'm not really sure doesnt it preserve it or something
In general, they don't.
The rule for the transformation above is translation. Translation is a transformation that moves every point of a figure the same distance in the same direction.
it doesnt completely destroy them but there is not as many after you have frozen it
translation
Sorry but they dontave it doesnt it suck sorry peeple :(
THis answers.com sukks sukss.. Doesnt noe nythin
Reflection
A rigid transformation that does not result in a reversed orientation of the original image is a translation or a rotation. Both transformations preserve the orientation of the figure, meaning that the shape and arrangement of points remain unchanged. In contrast, a reflection is the rigid transformation that reverses the orientation.