An enlargement.
Reflecting
translation
Reflection
No, isometric transformations do not change the size of shapes. They preserve distances and angles, meaning that the original shape and its image after the transformation will have the same dimensions. Examples of isometric transformations include translations, rotations, and reflections, which maintain the object's size and shape.
A isometry is a transformation where distance (aka size) is preserved. In a dilation, the size is being altered, so no, it is not an isometry.
An asymmetric enlargement. A convolution, Fourier transformation, for example.
A transformation that does not preserve distance and angle measures is a non-rigid transformation, such as a dilation or a shear transformation. In a dilation, the distances from a center point are scaled, changing the size of the figure but not maintaining the original shape. In a shear transformation, the shape is distorted by slanting it in one direction, altering both distances and angles between points. These transformations result in figures that are not congruent to their original form.
Reflecting
The question asks about the "following". In those circumstances would it be too much to expect that you make sure that there is something that is following?
I'm not really sure doesnt it preserve it or something
In general, they don't.
it doesnt completely destroy them but there is not as many after you have frozen it
The rule for the transformation above is translation. Translation is a transformation that moves every point of a figure the same distance in the same direction.
Sorry but they dontave it doesnt it suck sorry peeple :(
translation
THis answers.com sukks sukss.. Doesnt noe nythin
Reflection