The hypothesis would be exactly that (except for grammatical corrections): no square has an acute angle.
Chat with our AI personalities
I'm not sure I understand your actual question, but what you are actually asking with the wording is false. Two 30 degree angles would both be acute angles whos sum would only create another acute angle of 60 degrees. But if you have 2 acute angles, then the third would have to be obtuse to form a triangle.
INCORRECT: No because there is a obtuse triangle and a right triangleCORRECT ANSWERYes all triangles have at least two acute angles. Obtuse triangles and right triangles also have at least two acute angles. They are called obtuse triangles and right triangles because by definition they are triangles with ONE obtuse angle and ONE right angle. So therefore they both have 2 acute angles. Also for an acute triangle, it would have 3 acute angles.
A quadrilateral can have 0 to 3 acute angles, but never 4:A rectangle and a square are both quadrilaterals with four right angles, hence they have no acute angles.A kite-shaped figure can have one acute and three obtuse angles, or three acute and one obtuse angles.A parallelogram and a rhombus have two acute and two obtuse angles.The sum of the interior angles of any quadrilateral is 360º; thus it would be impossible for all angles to be acute (less than 90º each)
No, a trapezoid cannot have two acute angles and two obtuse angles. By definition, a trapezoid has only one pair of parallel sides. In a trapezoid, the non-parallel sides are always supplementary, meaning they add up to 180 degrees. Therefore, having two obtuse angles would make it impossible for the other two angles to be acute and still satisfy the properties of a trapezoid.
an isocelesANS2:Any triangle that has one right angle will have 2 acute angles. An acute angle is less than 90 degrees and the sum of all angles in a triangle is 180 degrees. The sum of the other two angles would have to add to 90 degrees so they would both have to be less than 90 degrees.