I guess you are asking about ancient Egyptian numbers. They did not use a "place value" numeric system, which is why they had no need for a "zero" in their numbers.
Think about the modern European/American system: starting from the right, the columns indicate units, then tens, then hundreds, then thousands and so on, but always using the same set of numbers from 0 to 9 no matter which column you look at.
The ancient Egyptians used completely differenthieroglyphs to indicate units (1 to 9), tens, hundreds, thousands; their numbers could be written from right to left, or left to right, or vertically downwards - and still mean exactly the same numeric value. For us, 15769 is not the same thing as 96751, but in the Egyptian system the "1" would always mean 10,000, the "5" would always mean 5,000 and so on, because of the signs used to write them.
Chat with our AI personalities
Because they didn't create it that way. There is no real reason they need one. I guess they decided they didn't want one or didn't think about that idea yet. There is no place value system in roman numerals because they had numeral for zero.
The Romans themselves didn't encounter any problems with their counting system which was in use for over a thousand years. It only is today that people have problems with the Roman numeral system because it doesn't contain a nought figure for positional place value purposes but the positional place value of these numerals are self evident so a nought figure is not needed.
Yes the Romans did have a symbol for zero and it looked like the letter N but they didn't need it in their numeral system for positional place value purposes because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
2
It is a system based on the place value.