A firm doesn't have "one and only responsibility". One responsibility is (usually) to make money; many firms are created for that purpose. But a firm also has a responsibility to society in general. A firm should do no harm, and the product or service it offers should actually be useful to society. The fact that sopme firms don't do this doesn't disprove the claim that they actually do have this responsibility, just as the fact that some fail to make a profit doesn't disprove that making money is one of the company's purposes.
keep you kids happy but be firm with your answers but not too firm
An indigenous firm is a company that only produces and sells in one country
Yes, always. Responsibility varies drastically by size of said firm but they will always be active agents of the firm, in a case or in the press
So that the firm can give you sale.Like,if you buy one the other one is free only to you!
Investors
They have only one responsibility: To pay the mortgage if the primary borrower fails to pay.See related question link.They have only one responsibility: To pay the mortgage if the primary borrower fails to pay.See related question link.They have only one responsibility: To pay the mortgage if the primary borrower fails to pay.See related question link.They have only one responsibility: To pay the mortgage if the primary borrower fails to pay.See related question link.
One responsibility that is only for US citizens is holding the office of the President of the United States. A person must be born in the US to be president. Voting is another thing that only citizens can do.
Assists the firm in achieving an enhanced reputation and market share
concern for the welfare of society
their is only one god Jesus
Yes, it is the only entertainment firm in the whole world, and everyone has heard of it, therefore it is not only a dominant firm in the UK, it is THE dominant firm in the UK. The only thing that could dominate this firm is Chuck Norris, and he does not live in the UK.
A strategist's attitude toward social responsibility can significantly shape a firm's strategic direction by influencing priorities and decision-making processes. If a strategist values social responsibility, the firm may adopt sustainable practices, enhance its brand reputation, and foster customer loyalty, which can lead to long-term profitability. Conversely, if social responsibility is viewed as a secondary concern, the firm might prioritize short-term gains, potentially risking reputational damage and stakeholder trust. Ultimately, a strategist's perspective on social responsibility can either align the firm with ethical practices or limit its competitive advantage in an increasingly socially conscious market.