a wood chuck would chuck wood as a woodchuck has wood and chuck in its name so a wood chuck could chuck wood. (if it trys) HA READ THAT OUT LOUD, SUMONE
The original tongue-twister is of unknown origin. In it,"How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?is paired with"A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could if a woodchuck could chuck wood."or"As much wood as a woodchuck would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood."
a wood chuck would chuck wood as a woodchuck has wood and chuck in its name so a wood chuck could chuck wood. (if it trys) HA READ THAT OUT LOUD, SUMONE
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, and chuck as much woodAs a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood. Is the full version.
First off, it is not a "chuck of wood." Second, a woodchuck can't chuck wood; it's scientifictly impossible to get the right answer. The original tongue twister goes: "How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood?"
As much wood as a woodchuck chucks if a woodchuck could chuck wood..... Riddle answer (It's not supposed to be scientific or just a number.) : As much wood as a wood chuck could chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood. See? Not scientifically just a tongue twister. BTW the question's supposed to be : How much wood can a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? Similar : How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? Only difference is the would and can. See it?
None!
Woodchuck Tongue Twister:How much wood would a woodchuck chuckif a woodchuck could chuck wood?Answer given in reply;He would chuck, he would, as much as he could,and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck wouldif a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Zero. If he can't chuck wood, he cannot chuck any wood at all. Alas: "A woodchuck would chuck no wood."
The original tongue-twister is of unknown origin. In it,"How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?is paired with"A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could if a woodchuck could chuck wood."or"As much wood as a woodchuck would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood."
The original meaning of the word chuck as it is applied in the case of the woodchuck is 'a dweller' in other words the 'dweller of the woods' or 'that thing that lives in the woods.' Used as a verb the word chuck means 'to throw'. So my opinion is no, woodchucks do not chuck wood.
But: How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Answer: A woodchuck could chuck all the wood a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood!