-12 over 5 = - 12/5 = - 2.4. This is the lower limit.
11 over 6 = 11/6 = 1.8333. This is the upper limit.
The integers between -2.4 and 1.833 are -2, -1, 0 and 1. Therefore, the number of integers between the two fractions is 4.
Hope that made sense.
TrueYes.All rational numbers are a fraction of one integer (numerator) over another integer (denominator).All integers can be made into a[n improper] fraction over a denominator of 1.Thus all integers are rational numbers
No, it is rational. A rational number is one which can be expressed as a ratio between two integers. Since 22 and 7 are both integers, then 22 over 7 is rational.
a rational number
Yes. A rational number can be written as a fraction. All integers can be written as themselves over one--as fractions.
Yes. A rational number can be written as a simple fraction where the numerator and denominator are integers, given that the denominator does not equal 0.
Put the integer over 100 then reduce.
TrueYes.All rational numbers are a fraction of one integer (numerator) over another integer (denominator).All integers can be made into a[n improper] fraction over a denominator of 1.Thus all integers are rational numbers
No - prime numbers are integers - a fraction cannot be a prime number.
116 and 219 are integers, not fractions.
A fraction is said to be in simplest form when the GCF of the numerator and denominator is 1. The GCF of consecutive integers is 1, so any fraction featuring consecutive integers will be in its simplest form.
No, it is rational. A rational number is one which can be expressed as a ratio between two integers. Since 22 and 7 are both integers, then 22 over 7 is rational.
They're not. Rational numbers are those that can be written as the ratio of two integers -- as a fraction with an integer on top and bottom, in other words. The number 1.5 is not an integer, but it is rational because you can write it as 3/2.
a rational number
Yes. A rational number can be written as a fraction. All integers can be written as themselves over one--as fractions.
No. The word integer means something that is complete. The word fraction means something that is not whole. So, they are mutually exclusive. However a fraction can represent an integer 3 is the same as 3/1 or 12/4, for example. Every integer can be written as itself over one. So if an integer can be written as a fraction, they are not mutually exclusive. 2 = 2/1 No
a rational number
dividing integers is when you use a fraction as an integer. Example: 5 over 2 divided by 2 over 5. So you have to inverse first so 5 over 2 divided by 2 over 5 would actually be 5 over 2 multiply by 2 over 5. So your answer would be:10 over 10 which equals a whole