No. A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number which has exactly two distinct natural number divisors: 1 and itself. 13 is only divisible by 1 and itself (13). 14 is also divisible by 2 and 7, therefor is not a Prime number.
A good way to remember prime numbers from 1 to 100: Take any number. If it is only divisible by 1 and itself, then it is a prime number. If it is divisible by any other numbers, then it is not a prime number. Example: 13. You can only get 13 by multiplying: 1 x 13, and 13 can only be divided by 13...13/13 = 1...or 1....13/1=13. So 13 IS a Prime number. Example 14. You can get 14 by multiplying: 1x14, 2x7, and you can divide 14 by 2 to get 7, or by 7 to get 2, so 14 is NOT a Prime number, since numbers other than itself and 1 are able to be divided into it to get whole numbers. This test will hold true for any prime number.
It's a prime number, so 1 & 13.
13 is a prime number so none
Well 13 is a prime number so only 13 and 1
no whole numbers can be multipled to get 13 besides 13 and 1 because 13 is a prime number which means it has no factors beside 1 and itselfhowever, u can multiply using decimals to get 13 such as 6.5*2 and etc.
A good way to remember prime numbers from 1 to 100: Take any number. If it is only divisible by 1 and itself, then it is a prime number. If it is divisible by any other numbers, then it is not a prime number. Example: 13. You can only get 13 by multiplying: 1 x 13, and 13 can only be divided by 13...13/13 = 1...or 1....13/1=13. So 13 IS a Prime number. Example 14. You can get 14 by multiplying: 1x14, 2x7, and you can divide 14 by 2 to get 7, or by 7 to get 2, so 14 is NOT a Prime number, since numbers other than itself and 1 are able to be divided into it to get whole numbers. This test will hold true for any prime number.
It's a prime number, so 1 & 13.
13 is a prime number so the only factors are 1 and itself.
Nope - you can divide it by 5 to get 13. So the prime factors of 65 are 5, 13
169 is not a prime number. it can be divided by 13. 169 / 13 = 13. so actually 13 would be the square root of 169.No, it is 13 x 13
13 is a prime number so none
Even number bigger than two are never prime so cross them out, leaving11,13,15,17,19Any number ending in 5 is divisible by 5 and so can not be prime,This leaves 11,13,17,19 which all could be prime and actually are.
Well 13 is a prime number so only 13 and 1
13 is a prime number so the only factors are 1 and itself.
13 is prime 14=2x7, 2 factors 15=3x5, 2 factors 16=24, 4 factors 17 is prime 18=2x32, 3 factors 19 is prime So the answer is 3 (14, 15 and 16)
No 13 is not a composite number. 13 is only divisible by 1 and itself. So it is a prime number.
Prime factors are factors that are prime. For example, 13 is a prime number and 13 is a factor of 26. So that means 13 is a prime factor.