No, it's 4.
There is one theory that has no mathematical fallacy:
F(1)=1/2=1-1/2=1-1/(2^1)
F(2)=1/2+1/4=3/4=1-1/4=1-1/(2^2)
F(3)=1/2+1/4+1/8=1/8=7/8=1-1/8=1-1/(2^3)
F(X)=1-1/(2^X)
suppose x=infinity
F(X)=1-1/(2^X)
(check:))
then
2(F(X))=1+1/2+1/4+1/8....
-(F(X))= 1/2+1/4+1/8....
add
F(X)=1
and
F(X)=1-1/(2^X)
remember:x=infinity
then 1=-1/(2^X)
subtract 1
multiply by 2 to the power of X
1=0
(absurd but logical)
add four
use additive theory
then
2+2=5
and
2+2=4
(absurd but logical)
The Commutative Property
then 4 plus 3 equals 28 and 3 plus 3 equals 18 and 7 plus 5 equals 84 .... its easy you just have to multiply the answer with the first number.. for example : 2 plus 3 equals 5 but when you multiply the answer with the first number (2) it becomes equals 10, and so on the others..
1 plus 1 equals one fact
The answer is 15.
No. In the order of operations, 5 divided by 5 comes first. Let's say x equals 2. 2 plus 5 divided by 5 plus two 2 plus 1 plus 2 3 plus 2 equals 5. The answer is 5
It doesn't ! -7 plus -5 equals -12 ! -7 plus 5 equals -2
7+2+5= 14 35 42
-2 plus 5 equals +3
5 plus 25 equals 60. Need to solve for 5 plus 25 equals ?: 2 plus 10 equals 24 is equivalent to 2 × (1 plus 5) equals 2 × (12); and 3 plus 15 equals 36 is equivalent to 3 ×(1 plus 5) equals 3 × (12); thus 5 plus 25 equals ? is equivalent to 5 × (1 plus 5) equals 5 × (12); thus ? = 5 × 12 = 60.
2+5=7 5+2=7 2+5=5+2
-2 plus 5 = 3
No.
143544
5
This equation is not possible. Two plus three plus four plus five does not equal 287. The system has no solution.
The Commutative Property
64