no
Its commutative property of addition
No, subtraction is not associative. The associative property states that the grouping of numbers does not affect the result of an operation. For example, in subtraction, (5 - 3) - 2 equals 0, while 5 - (3 - 2) equals 4, demonstrating that changing the grouping changes the result. Thus, subtraction fails to satisfy the associative property.
As it appears the only thing it illustrates is the identity property ie anything is equal to itself. If there were brackets: (2 + 8 ) + 7 = 2 + (8 + 7) then that would illustrate the associative property of addition of numbers.
2 plus 8 equals 8 plus 2 demonstrates the commutative property of addition
False.
Its commutative property of addition
No, subtraction is not associative. The associative property states that the grouping of numbers does not affect the result of an operation. For example, in subtraction, (5 - 3) - 2 equals 0, while 5 - (3 - 2) equals 4, demonstrating that changing the grouping changes the result. Thus, subtraction fails to satisfy the associative property.
As it appears the only thing it illustrates is the identity property ie anything is equal to itself. If there were brackets: (2 + 8 ) + 7 = 2 + (8 + 7) then that would illustrate the associative property of addition of numbers.
2 plus 8 equals 8 plus 2 demonstrates the commutative property of addition
False.
commutative property
Commutative property of addition.
the commutative property of addition
The commutative property
It is the associative property of addition that allows you to write the sum as 2+2+2+4 without the need for brackets to specify the order in which the additions need to be carried out.
This is the commutative property of addition.
The associative property of multiplication. For an example of the associative property, read on. 2 x 3 x 4= 2 x 3 x 4. Simple, huh?