answersLogoWhite

0

It seems like your question is incomplete. To solve an inequality involving 12, you'll need to specify what the inequality is (e.g., (12 < x), (12 \geq 3x), etc.). Once you provide the complete inequality, I can guide you through the solution process!

User Avatar

AnswerBot

4mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

How do you solve -12 is less than or equal to -12?

You normally "solve" something when there is a variable involved. In this case there is no variable. All you have to do is decide whether it is true or false. If this is derived from an original equation (or, in this case, inequality) which involved variables, then if the equation (or inequality) without variables is true, it means it is true for ANY value of the variable. If it is false, the original equation (or inequality) can't be satisfied by any value of the variable.


How do you clear decimals when solving an inequality?

To clear decimals in an inequality, multiply every term in the inequality by a power of ten that eliminates the decimal points. For example, if the inequality is 0.5x &lt; 1.2, you would multiply all terms by 10 to get 5x &lt; 12. After multiplying, ensure the direction of the inequality remains the same, and proceed to solve the inequality as you normally would.


How do you solve a inequality word problem?

To solve an inequality word problem, first, identify the variables and the relationships described in the problem. Translate the words into a mathematical inequality, using symbols to represent the relationships (e.g., &lt;, &gt;, ≤, ≥). Then, solve the inequality just as you would with an equation, applying algebraic operations while keeping the inequality in mind. Finally, interpret the solution in the context of the original problem to provide a meaningful answer.


Solve the following inequality 38 4x3 plus 7-3x?

To solve the above inequality equation it has to have an equality sign so that i group all the the knowns and the unknowns.


Solve the inequality -2b 16?

b -8

Related Questions

Solve the inequality. 3x > 12?

x &gt; 4


Solve this inequality 3p - 16 20?

C. p &lsaquo; 12


Solve this inequality 3p - 16 is less than 20?

p is less than 12.


Solve this inequality 3p- 16 21?

This is not an inequality. There is no &lt;,&gt;, or = sign.


Solve the inequality and enter your solution as an inequality comparing the variable to the solution -3 plus x10?

Solve the inequality and enter your solution as an inequality comparing the variable to the solution. -33+x&lt;-33


How do you solve -12 is less than or equal to -12?

You normally "solve" something when there is a variable involved. In this case there is no variable. All you have to do is decide whether it is true or false. If this is derived from an original equation (or, in this case, inequality) which involved variables, then if the equation (or inequality) without variables is true, it means it is true for ANY value of the variable. If it is false, the original equation (or inequality) can't be satisfied by any value of the variable.


How do you solve -24?

There is no equation not inequality. So there is nothing to solve!


How do you solve sqrt3x-5 plus sqrtx-12?

There is no equation or inequality in the question that can be solved! There is an expression but expressions cannot be solved.


Solve for the value of x in the expression -6x-73x plus 12?

An expression cannot be solved: only an equation or inequality has solutions.


Solve the inequality 3 -2 x 7.?

The above is not an inequality as stated.


Solve the inequality and enter your solution as an inequality in the box below?

x&gt;-9


How do you clear decimals when solving an inequality?

To clear decimals in an inequality, multiply every term in the inequality by a power of ten that eliminates the decimal points. For example, if the inequality is 0.5x &lt; 1.2, you would multiply all terms by 10 to get 5x &lt; 12. After multiplying, ensure the direction of the inequality remains the same, and proceed to solve the inequality as you normally would.