No, the ratios 2 to 3 and 5 to 6 are not equivalent. To determine if two ratios are equivalent, you can cross-multiply: 2 × 6 equals 12, while 3 × 5 equals 15. Since 12 does not equal 15, the ratios are not equivalent.
No
They are: 4 to 10, 6 to 15 and 8 to 20
5 to 6 10 to 12 15 to 18
4 to 6 1 to 1.5 5 to 7.5 6 to 9
Two equivalent ratios for 6 to 10 are 3 to 5 and 12 to 20. You can find these by simplifying the original ratio or by multiplying both terms by the same factor. For example, dividing both terms by 2 gives you 3 to 5, and multiplying both by 2 results in 12 to 20.
No
It is: 1/3 = 2/6
5 to 110 to 2
1 to 3 2 to 6 3 to 9
The three ratios that are equivalent to 2 to 5 are : 2 * 2 / 5 *24/ 103 * 2 / 5 *3 = 6/ 15.4 * 2 / 5 *4 = 8/ 20.
This sentence is a non-example. Answer.com is a non-example. Anything that has nothing to do with ratios is a non-example.
They are: 4 to 10, 6 to 15 and 8 to 20
5 to 1 15 to 3 20 to 4
no they are not
5 to 2
1:5, 2:10, 3:15, 4:20
6.25:1.25 = 5:1 =15:3=10:2