No.
The Romans used letters to represent quantities.
Whereas the Greeks used letters and symbols to represent quantities.
no such thing.
Unfortunately, the roman numeral 'Z' does not exist. ):
They are the same thing.
No. If you are trying to state "15" then the correct Roman Numerals would be XV.
i thing it like 130Improved :-It is XXL = XXX = 30
no such thing.
Unfortunately, the roman numeral 'Z' does not exist. ):
They are the same thing.
lxi i thing yow
For one thing, it's the way of indicating 2001 in Roman numerals.
No. If you are trying to state "15" then the correct Roman Numerals would be XV.
it means the same thing as in Greek just its Roman.
So-called Arabic numerals make it possible to perform mathematical operations, like division and subtraction, unlike the clumsy Roman numerals which were only useful for stating numbers, not for crunching them. For one thing, Arab numerals include the zero, which Roman numerals do not.
i thing it like 130Improved :-It is XXL = XXX = 30
XL with a horizontal line over the whole thing denoting 40,000 rather than 40.
Roman numerals were used as a counting system where certain letters stood for a set quantity. Here is a list of letters used and their coresponding quantity. I - 1 V - 5 X - 10 L - 50 C - 100 D - 500 M - 1,000 If you wished to type 7 in roman numerals it would be represented as VII (5+1+1). As another example 615 would be represented as DCXV. One thing to keep in mind when writing with roman numerals is that it is sometimes best to consolidate. What I mean is that if you were to type 4 in roman numerals, it is shorter (and easier) to type it out as IV (-1 from 5) as opposed to IIII. You'll notice that the I came BEFORE the V therefor subtracting one from it. Consequently, 744 would be represented as DCCXLIV as opposed to DCCXXXXIIII.
The closest thing to a Roman Forum in Greek time would have been the Agora, which was the Greek meeting place and market.