No, and integer is a whole number (ie has neither decimals nor fractions in it) an integer can, however be negative or even imaginary
Yes. The number 1 + i is imaginary but not pure imaginary, while 5i is pure imaginary.
It is a pure imaginary number.Since (a+bi)-(a-bi) = 2bi, it is a pure imaginary number (it has no real component).
No, but √-23 is. An imaginary number is the square root of a negative number.
A number with no decimals is called a whole number, or an integer.
No, and integer is a whole number (ie has neither decimals nor fractions in it) an integer can, however be negative or even imaginary
Yes. The number 1 + i is imaginary but not pure imaginary, while 5i is pure imaginary.
You convert the real part and the imaginary parts separately.
If a number is pure imaginary then it has no real component. If it is a real number, then there is no imaginary component. If it has both real and imaginary components, then it is a complex number.
an imaginary number is imaginary so no (i guess) this answer kind of sucks
-125 is NOT an imaginary number.
That quotient would be an imaginary number. The actual number depends on exactly what imaginary number you divide the 7 by.
It is a pure imaginary number.Since (a+bi)-(a-bi) = 2bi, it is a pure imaginary number (it has no real component).
No, but √-23 is. An imaginary number is the square root of a negative number.
A number with no decimals is called a whole number, or an integer.
No. Anything that has a finite number of decimals (or repeating decimals) is a rational number.
Are equivalent decimals.