They are equivalent.
Yes.If you simplify them they are both 1 to 3 :) hope this helps
Yes
rational number
6 to 7 12 to 14 600 to 700
Three equivalent ratios of 1 to 3 are 2 to 6, 4 to 12, and 5 to 15. These ratios maintain the same proportional relationship, meaning that for every 1 unit of the first quantity, there are 3 units of the second quantity. Each ratio can be derived by multiplying both parts of the original ratio by the same number.
Yes.If you simplify them they are both 1 to 3 :) hope this helps
Yes
rational number
6 to 7 12 to 14 600 to 700
Three equivalent ratios of 1 to 3 are 2 to 6, 4 to 12, and 5 to 15. These ratios maintain the same proportional relationship, meaning that for every 1 unit of the first quantity, there are 3 units of the second quantity. Each ratio can be derived by multiplying both parts of the original ratio by the same number.
An example of two equivalent ratios is 1:2 and 3:6. Both ratios represent the same relationship; for every 1 unit of one quantity, there are 2 units of another, and for every 3 units of the first quantity, there are 6 units of the second. This shows that both ratios maintain the same proportional relationship, even though the numbers differ.
7 to 3 14 to 6
0.3:0.7 3:7 6:14 15:35
No, the ratios 2 to 3 and 5 to 6 are not equivalent. To determine if two ratios are equivalent, you can cross-multiply: 2 × 6 equals 12, while 3 × 5 equals 15. Since 12 does not equal 15, the ratios are not equivalent.
It is: 1/3 = 2/6
30 : 40 and 33 : 44 are two possible equivalent ratios.
Two equivalent ratios for 2 to 7 are 4 to 14 and 6 to 21. These ratios maintain the same proportion as the original ratio by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by the same factor (2 and 3, respectively).