Yes, it's possible. The requirement is that each side must be shorter than the sum of the other two sides. In this case, 7 is shorter than 6 + 9, 6 is shorter than 7 + 9, and 9 is shorter than 7 + 6. Consequently, you can build a triangle with sides of length 7, 6, and 9.
No, it is not. For a right triangle, from the Pythagoraen theorem, 7 squared plus 9 squared does not equal 12 squared
Not sure about a trainagle, but if you mean a triangle, the answer is * * * * *5 * * 10 * * * *9 * 6 * * * 8 * * * 7
(7+1)*(9-6) = 24
A scalene triangle.
Yes, it's possible. The requirement is that each side must be shorter than the sum of the other two sides. In this case, 7 is shorter than 6 + 9, 6 is shorter than 7 + 9, and 9 is shorter than 7 + 6. Consequently, you can build a triangle with sides of length 7, 6, and 9.
Yes.
No, it is not. For a right triangle, from the Pythagoraen theorem, 7 squared plus 9 squared does not equal 12 squared
Yes, it is.
An acute angled scalene triangle.
Yes if you mean sides of 7, 6 and 9
Not sure about a trainagle, but if you mean a triangle, the answer is * * * * *5 * * 10 * * * *9 * 6 * * * 8 * * * 7
i its isosceles
5 and 9/7 = 6 and 2/7
[(-7)+(4)-(6)]/-(9) = 1
(7+1)*(9-6) = 24
No, and it really is very easy to check!