No, a corollary follows from a theorem that has been proven. Of course, a theorem can be proven using a corollary to a previous theorem.
No. A corollary is a statement that can be easily proved using a theorem.
A corollary.
A segment need not be a bisector. No theorem can be used to prove something that may not be true!
a theorem that follows directly from another theorem or postulate, with little of no proof
No, a corollary follows from a theorem that has been proven. Of course, a theorem can be proven using a corollary to a previous theorem.
Yes, but only a corollary to another theorem that has been proved. A corollary follows from a theorem.
A corollary is a statement that can easily be proved using a theorem.
No. A corollary is a statement that can be easily proved using a theorem.
No. A corollary is a statement that can be easily proved using a theorem.
Postulate, Corollary, Definition, & Theorem
A corollary.
A Corollary
No, in fact it is the opposite. A corollary is normally a special case of a theorem and is usually sufficiently important for it to be proven separately from the theorem. This is so that it can then be used in the future. Corollaries follow a theorem and can usually be derived from it very easily.
A segment need not be a bisector. No theorem can be used to prove something that may not be true!
No. A corollary goes a little bit further than a theorem and, while most of the proof is based on the theorem, the extra bit needs additional proof.
definition,postulate,theorem,& CorollaryDefinition, Theorem, Corollary, and PostulateA.PostulateB.DefinitionD.Algebraic property(answers for apex)a and cpostulate, theorem, and definition