Quite simply, no. The Spending multiplier, even on government spending, will always have a value of greater than one. It really is self-evident; for that money to be subjected to a multiplier, it must be circulating multiple times, therefore the first circulation (the initial spending) would result in a multiplier of one, and subsequent spends would increase the multiplier further
If the full multiplier for G (i.e. ignoring crowding out effects) is = change in G/Multiplier Then the tax multiplier is = change in T x marginal propensity to consume/multiplier since the mpc is between 0 and 1 the tax multiplier is less. Intuitively it is not difficult to see why, the change tax enters spending decisions through consumption and consumption is dependant on the mpc. Whereas as G affects spending decisions directly - it is a injection into the economy that does not have to work through some indirect source to have an effect on the economy.
It means that depending on its position, a digit will have a "multiplier value" that will make it worth more or less. In the number "123", the place-value of the digit 3 is 1, the place-value of digit 2 is 10, and the left-most place-value - for the digit 1 - is 100. In other words, the mere fact that there are other numbers to the right of the "1" make it worth more.
A value that is less than zero.A value that is less than zero.A value that is less than zero.A value that is less than zero.
try spending less....
In order to find the lcm (less common multiplier) you need another number, so the lcm of 484 is 484 in this instance
The government spending multiplier is different form the tax multiplier from the top of my head is because the government spending total effect ripples off. That is if government spending increase then the total income increases. When total income increase, consumption increases, when consumption increases total income increases further (as consumption is a factor of total income), and this pattern is carried forward. This is the the multiplier effect, such that an increase in government spending's final impact on income is much bigger than its initial increase. The tax multiplier on the other hand, has a much smaller effect than government spending. This is because tax is only a portion of the consumer income. That is, if there is a tax cut, consumers only save a fractional amount (specifically 1-MPC) of a tax cut. As a result of the smaller boost in spending form ma tax cut, the ripples/multiplier effect of a tax cut is much less than an increase in government spending.
If the full multiplier for G (i.e. ignoring crowding out effects) is = change in G/Multiplier Then the tax multiplier is = change in T x marginal propensity to consume/multiplier since the mpc is between 0 and 1 the tax multiplier is less. Intuitively it is not difficult to see why, the change tax enters spending decisions through consumption and consumption is dependant on the mpc. Whereas as G affects spending decisions directly - it is a injection into the economy that does not have to work through some indirect source to have an effect on the economy.
growing levels of government spending
Republican - The beliefes of a Republican is no abortian, Prolife (marridge between man and woman), less taxes, less government spending Demacrat - Marridge between man &woman, and homasexuals. More taxes, and more Government Spending.
Republican - The beliefes of a Republican is no abortian, Prolife (marridge between man and woman), less taxes, less government spending Demacrat - Marridge between man &woman, and homasexuals. More taxes, and more Government Spending.
the government will spend less money than it earns by cutting its spending or raising its taxes
Benefit of Spending Less Reducing your spending can be worth more than you might think. Use this calculator to see just how much your budget reductions may be worth, if you were to invest them. View the value of this new potential nest egg both with and without taxes factored in.
federal government can lower interest rates and stimulate spending to make the business cycle less disruptive.
There either is too much spending in economy(causing inflation) or There is too little spending in economy(resulting in less jobs due to layoffs). The US government solves: if too much spending, taxes go up. if too little spending, less interest rates(established by the Federal Reserve) given to tempt investors to invest.
creates jobs => less unemployment => less people on welfare => government spending can go to other important things
The government spends less money than it earns by cutting its spending or by raising taxes. A+
the more of the money there is, the less of the value. the less of the money, the more of the value. for example, if the US government printed a LOT of money to fix the economy, the value of a dollar would be less because there are so much of it. hope that helps!