answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can a postulate be used to explain the steps of a proof?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Can a postulate be used to justify the steps of a proof?

no


Which of the following types of statement cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof Check all that apply?

Conjecture and Guess.


What is used to explain a statement in a geometric proof?

Postulate, Corollary, Definition, & Theorem


What types of statement can be used to explain the steps of a proof?

The corollaries types of statement is what is used to explain the steps of a proof.


What types of the statement can be used to explain the steps of a proof?

The corollaries types of statement is what is used to explain the steps of a proof.


Which types of statements can justify the steps of proof?

Theorems, definitions, corollaries, and postulates


Which of the following types of statement cannot be used to justify the steps of a proof check all that apply a guess b theorem c conjecture d postulate?

Guess Conjecture


What is used to support steps of a geometric proof?

Steps in a geometric proof do not require support


What is a statement that accepted without proof?

A statement accepted without proof is commonly known as a theorem. The other word that is used for such statements is postulate.


which of the following reasons can be used for statement 2 of the proof?

vertical angles theorem


Can a theorem be used to explain the steps of a proof?

Yes, a theorem can be used to provide the key ideas or principles necessary to construct a proof. Theorems serve as the foundation for a mathematical argument and can guide the reasoning and structure of the proof.


What type of statement cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof?

A statement that is subjective, ambiguous, or based on opinion cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof. In a mathematical proof, each step must be based on objective facts, definitions, axioms, or previously proven theorems in order to ensure the validity and rigor of the argument. Statements that rely on personal beliefs, feelings, or interpretations are not suitable for constructing a logical proof.