no because there are infinitive numbers between desimals.
Decimals are numbers.
They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".
Some decimals are. Counting numbers are a proper subset of decimals.
rounding whole numbers and decimals
no because there are infinitive numbers between desimals.
They don't, the closest you can it get is from 9+10, which is 19, or 10+11, which is 21. Decimals aren't really considered consecutive numbers.
Whole numbers do not contain decimals or fractions because they are integers in the form of: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .... etc
Decimals are numbers.
They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".
Some decimals are. Counting numbers are a proper subset of decimals.
In the entire infinite supply of whole numbers, fractions, and decimals, whether positive or negative, there is only one single number that is equal to 5280. It is . . . . . 5280 .
Consecutive whole numbers will have an odd sum. Consecutive odd numbers, or consecutive prime numbers, will be 29 and 31.
rounding whole numbers and decimals
The numbers 2 and 3 are consecutive prime numbers. Are there other pairs of prime numbers which are consecutive numbers?
Factors must be whole numbers, not decimals.
There are no two consecutive odd numbers.