0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which temperature is colder 0 degrees Fahrenheit or 200 Kelvin?
200 kelvin is much colder than 0 degrees F (200 kelvin = -99.67 F).
Can anything get colder than 0 K?
No. 0 degr.K (or more correctly 0 Kelvin) is absolute zero = minus 273.2 degr.C
The product of k and -5 is no more than 30?
K is between -6 and 0
Is 14k of greater value than 18k?
Yes, if K<0. No otherwise.
Why you can divide 0 by 3 but not 3 by 0?
3*0 = 0 Dividing both sides by 3 gives 0 = 0/3 and therefore 0/3 is defined and is equal to 0. However, there is no number, k, such that k*0 = 3 and so division by 0 is not defined. If there were such a number k, then you could divide both sides by k to give 0 = 3/k. But there is no such k.
Which temperature is colder 0 degrees Fahrenheit or 200 Kelvin?
200 kelvin is much colder than 0 degrees F (200 kelvin = -99.67 F).
Can anything get colder than 0 K?
No. 0 degr.K (or more correctly 0 Kelvin) is absolute zero = minus 273.2 degr.C
What is the kelvin system?
In the Kelvin system 0 is set at he coldest possible temperature which is called absolute zero. Each degree kelvin is equal to a degree Celsius. The freezing point of water is 273.15 K so absolute zero is -273.15 deg C. There can be nothing colder than 0 K.
Is 200 K colder than 0 C?
Yes, 200 K is colder than 0°C. This is because the Kelvin scale starts from absolute zero, which is devoid of any molecular movement, while the Celsius scale starts at the freezing point of water.
Which is colder 172 K or -75 degrees celsius?
172 K is colder than -75 degrees Celsius. This is because 172 K is equivalent to -101 degrees Celsius, which is lower than -75 degrees Celsius.
What is colder Bulgaria or Jam mu and Kashmir?
J & K colder
The product of k and -5 is no more than 30?
K is between -6 and 0
Can things get colder then o K?
No, temperatures below 0 Kelvin are not physically possible as it is the lowest limit of the Kelvin scale and represents absolute zero, where particles stop moving.
Is 14k of greater value than 18k?
Yes, if K<0. No otherwise.
Why you can divide 0 by 3 but not 3 by 0?
3*0 = 0 Dividing both sides by 3 gives 0 = 0/3 and therefore 0/3 is defined and is equal to 0. However, there is no number, k, such that k*0 = 3 and so division by 0 is not defined. If there were such a number k, then you could divide both sides by k to give 0 = 3/k. But there is no such k.
What is k minus k?
k - k = 0
What number of tiles that will make a rectangle that is2 tiles wide?
The answer is 2*k where k is any integer greater than 0.
