No, you cannot be charged with theft without proof. In order to bring charges, law enforcement and prosecutors must have sufficient evidence to support the claim that a theft occurred and that the accused was involved. This evidence can include eyewitness accounts, surveillance footage, or physical evidence linking the suspect to the crime. Without such proof, a charge would likely not stand in court.
Yes, postulates are accepted without proof and do not have counterexamples.
no?
No. Axioms and postulates are statements that we accept as true without proof.
A postulate.
seconder
== ==
You need evidence to prove any charge.
No you have to have proof. Which you probobly don't
To allege to is accuse without proof. For example, He allegedly robbed the bank, though no one had ever devoped any evidence to support this charge.
No!!!!!
A rule or a statement that is accepted without proof is a postulate.
Yes, postulates are accepted without proof and do not have counterexamples.
thef-haccs
p[o kl, m, mj, nm,
declared, but without proof to judge some one without having proof
yes with anti-thef on your car
drain the fuel