It could be any number whatsoever.
It could either be a terminating decimal or the decimal representation of an irrational number.
A compound word for alike could be copycat.
The word "upshot" is a compound word.
In decimal from, it could be written as 130 minutes.
The empirical formula is representative for the chemical composition of a compound; the structural formula is representative for the spatial structure of the compound.
Yes, ch3o is a compound. It is the chemical formula for methoxy group, which is a functional group in organic chemistry.
The X in compound X2O could represent elements such as calcium, strontium, or barium as they form oxides in the formula X2O.
It could be a carbohydrate. It couldn't be a protein because proteins also contain nitrogen.
The molecular formula of a compound with an empirical formula of CH is likely to be CH, as there is only one carbon atom and one hydrogen atom in the empirical formula. In this case, the empirical formula is also the molecular formula.
There seems to be a mistake in the chemical formula you provided. It does not follow standard chemical notation. If you could provide the correct formula or name of the compound, I would be happy to help you with more information.
Chicago.CHI is not valid as a molecular formula; such a compound could not possibly be stable.
The correct name for compound P2I3 is diphosphorus triiodide.
There is no compound by the name nitrogen phosphate. The best match I could think of is ammonium phosphate with the formula, (NH4)3PO4
What you write for an ionic compound is called the formula unit, but the formula unit is almost always the same as the empirical formula. The answer to your question could not be the molecular formula because an ionic compound is not a molecule.
The correct formula for a compound of phosphorus and hydrogen is PH3, known as phosphine.
PH4 could refer to phosphine, which is a chemical compound with the formula PH3. It is a colorless, flammable gas.