0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Rafa
Lao
EzraAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a sentence for the word recurring?
Stop posing recurring questions.
Is 'to be or not to be' one or two questions?
two! if you answer them different. that's what i think. == It is one question, and Hamlet is looking at two apparently exclusive alternatives. If you attempt to break it down into two questions, you will run into some difficulties. What would Hamlet mean by asking "To be?" He may be asking "Shall I continue to exist?", or "Shall I continue to be the way that I am?" or perhaps "Shall I just be rather than thrive?". The same kinds of problem would fall to the one question "...not to be?" Hamlet both clarifies and mystifies by offering the alternative: "Which of these shall govern my actions-- "be", or "not be"? By posing the question this way, Hamlet accepts the exquisite bind that faces him. The outcome is not by default; he should actively choose what comes next and not allow the actions of others to move him passively. It is one _ "to be or not to be -that is THE question.
What is a suicide shower?
I am pretty sure its where you die when you are in a shower or bathtub. Look up on youtube, Pretty Please or something by Pink.Watch the music video till the end, and you will see what Im talking about
What foreign powers dominated palestine at the end of the Old Testament?
It was the mighty Roman power.another answerActually they were under the control of the Persian empire at the time that the last book (Malachi) of the Old Testament was written, and shortly before the time when Alexander the Great came on the scene and conquered most of the known world. This last book was wrote around 400 years before the birth of Christ.A reason for wanting to deviate from this date is a result of wanting to take a book like Daniel and claim that it was wrote at a much later date than it would claim by its content, and so making it the last book of the Old Testament. According to Daniel, wrote by Daniel, it was wrote by this man near the end of the Babylonian Empire and into the onset of the Mede-Persian empire (around 530-576 BC)The desire of critics to want to make the book of a much later date and by a different author, posing as said Daniel, results mainly from the detailed accuracy given in many of Daniels prophecies. These prophecies are very specific concerning the end of the Persian Empire by the rise and conquering by Alexander the great, along with his early untimely death, and the resulting split of his empire among his generals and the long back and forth battles between those split off sections of Alexander's old empire, especially between the Ptolemic dynasty of northern Africa and the Seleucid of the Syrian region, whereby Palestine become a battleground and a punching bag between these then world powers. All of this was prophesied about in Daniel in a very detailed fashion, centuries before it happened.The reasoning was that because the prophecy was so specific pertaining to these things, and the stylistic use of both the Aramaic and Hebrew, switched back and forth in a book obviously not all wrote at the same time, that then therefore it must mean that the book of Daniel was not wrote by this person but by some Jew at a later date. That is, it must be wrote beyond the date of these happenings and so was actually a writing of history and not a prophecy.Thus placing the Old Testament closing near the time of the rise of Rome, or at least later in the Seleucid empire, rather than the time claimed in the Text.There are other things involved but as plausible as it might sound at first glance, this is a very tired old attempt that is full of holes and contradicts many ancient historical sources that testify to the veracity of Daniel ; Christ himself claims that Daniel was wrote by the Daniel of the book of Daniel by referencing a passage of that Book as being by Daniel the Prophet etc et.That the Daniel of this book wrote this book and at the time the book demands in a historical context has been shown to be historically true, over and over again and the claims to the contrary have likewise been demonstrated time and again to be completely false and mere conjecture, and speculation with no legitimate basis in reality.So, recap: Persia was in power at the close of the Old Testament (Malachi).
When do you use a diaphragm seal What is the process of measurement and control?
Process measurement sensors are not indestructible. Not even the most rugged device is fully immune to the chemical nature of process media or the kinetic impact associated with fluid composition and movement. Balancing degrees of protection, usually to increase the useful life of the device, with sensor response and accuracy is a frequent challenge in the process measurement and control field. Industrial processes commonly are associated with corrosive or toxic fluids, often at extreme pressure or temperature and containing various levels of solids. Any of these traits can pose substantial risk to process performance and uptime. Operations that process fluids will employ pressure measurement devices to monitor process performance and maintain system safety levels. There are many instances where characteristics of the process and its media are not compatible with pressure measurement devices. Here are some potentially problematic scenarios for pressure measurement instruments: Corrosive media that will prematurely deteriorate the pressure sensing element. Viscous or fibrous media, also those that may crystallize or polymerize, posing a risk of clogging channels, tubes, and orifices of pressure measurement devices. Media temperature that is beyond the rated range for the pressure measurement device has a potential to damage the instrument or cause error in the pressure reading. A measuring point that is remotely located from where a technician may need to observe the reading. Also conceivable, the pressure measurement device needs to be located away from other potentially damaging environmental conditions. The process requirements dictate specific hygienic requirements that are cause for the measurement device to be isolated from the medium. Toxic or otherwise hazardous media that must be contained. Excursions of system pressure may exceed the acceptable range of the instrument, potentially damaging the device. A solution which can provide protection from the items listed above, while still maintaining instrument response and accuracy is a diaphragm seal. Seals are placed between the pressure measurement device and the process media. The space between the diaphragm, which is flexible, and the sensor is filled with a fluid that will hydraulically transfer the pressure condition on the process side of the diaphragm to the sensor. The diaphragm serves as a physical barrier between the potentially damaging media and the instrument. Diaphragm seals are available in a wide variety of configurations to accommodate any media type or connection requirement. Seal selection involves specifying the connections and form factor to properly mate the diaphragm with the instrument and the process, then selecting the diaphragm material that will be compatible with the media. The best way to achieve a positive solution is to share your requirements with a qualified assembler. They can help select the right diaphragm seal and mate it up with a pressure gauge, providing a complete assembly that is ready to be installed in your process.
