No, the numbers 32.3232, 32.4932, and 32.51 do not round to the same whole number. When rounding to the nearest whole number, 32.3232 rounds down to 32, 32.4932 rounds up to 33, and 32.51 also rounds up to 33. Each number rounds to a different whole number due to the decimal values being closer to the next whole number in the case of 32.4932 and 32.51.
No. 32.32 and 32.49 round to 32.00, but 32.51 rounds to 33.00.
You can't convert a number with decimals (or a fraction) to a whole number, without losing precision. You can round it to the nearest number, or truncate it (just remove the decimals), but in any case, that won't be the same number (just the nearest integer, in case you choose to round it), so "2.8 as a whole number" really doesn't exist.
That's the same as the nearest whole number. This example rounds to zero.
No because only 32.51 can be rounded to 33
You can't write a non-integer as an integer. You can round it to the closest integer if you like, but it's not exactly the same number.
That isn't a whole number. You can round it to the nearest whole number, but that will no longer be the same number.
6934 is to the nearest whole number. A whole number is a number that does not consist of a fraction or decimal. The digit after the decimal is one, so the four would not round up it would stay the same.
No. 32.32 and 32.49 round to 32.00, but 32.51 rounds to 33.00.
When you converting a decimal to a whole number, precision will get lost (you lose the decimal part). The "converted" number will, of course, not be exactly the same as the original number.You must decide, depending on your needs, whether you want to:Round to the nearest whole number (3 in this case).Round up (also 3 in this case).Round down (2 in this case).
Oh, isn't that a happy little number! To round 7.3333 to a whole number, we look at the digit after the decimal point. Since it's 3, which is less than 5, we simply keep the whole number part the same, making it 7. So, our rounded whole number is 7.
You can't convert a number with decimals (or a fraction) to a whole number, without losing precision. You can round it to the nearest number, or truncate it (just remove the decimals), but in any case, that won't be the same number (just the nearest integer, in case you choose to round it), so "2.8 as a whole number" really doesn't exist.
No. However, 24.5 will round up to 25, if rounded to the nearest whole number.
That's the same as the nearest whole number. This example rounds to zero.
No because only 32.51 can be rounded to 33
To round 13.2 to the nearest whole number, you look at the tenths place, which is the 2 in this case. Since 2 is less than 5, you keep the whole number 13 the same and drop the decimal and any digits after it. Therefore, rounding 13.2 to the nearest whole number gives you 13.
1250 rounded to the nearest whole number is 1250. When rounding a number to the nearest whole number, you look at the digit to the right of the decimal point. If it is 5 or greater, you round up; if it is less than 5, you round down. In this case, there is no decimal point, so the number remains the same.
Oh, dude, rounding 3.125 to the nearest whole number is like basic math 101. You just look at the decimal part, which is 0.125, and because it's less than 0.5, you just keep the whole number part the same. So, 3.125 rounded to the nearest whole number is simply 3. Easy peasy, lemon squeezy!