Most computers use ASCII (or some similar) encoding, in which 'A' is represented as 65, or 01000001 binary. Older IBM mainframes use an entirely different encoding.
Short for Extended Binary Coded Decimal Interchange Code, EBCDIC was first developed by IBM and is a coding method generally used by larger computers to present letters, numbers or other symbols in a binary language the computer can understand. EBCDIC is similar to ASCII commonly used on most computers and computer equipment today.
IBM
John Backus and IBM :))
James Gimzewski at the IBM laboratory in Zurich, Switzerland made the world's smallest calculator.
IBM came first
No. They are two entirely separate corporations. In terms of market capitalization, Apple is bigger than IBM.
All three companies produce computers that are compatible with many products created by IBM.
i thin it might be IBM because apple have their own way of Surfing the web and stuff
Windows works with IBM machines, though Windows '98 is incredibly obsolete at this time.
Technically, the only computers that can be called "IBM Computers" are the ones that have been manufactured and/or sold by IBM. However, the "IBM Compatible Computers" are those that have been built in accordance with the IBM Standard. IBM created the original PC then turned it over to the "open architecture" community to be built by anyone who wants to follow those standards. IBM Compatible computers are the "PC" including the Laptop PC. Pretty much just about anything that's not "Apple".
IBM no longer produces hardware that is compatible with Windows '98 but it will run on a recent Apple computer within the Virtual Box software. (See links below)
They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.
IBM (International Business Machines) set the standard for personal computers with their IBM PC, which was introduced in 1981. The IBM PC set the standard for hardware architecture and software compatibility, and was widely adopted by other manufacturers. Today, personal computers still follow the basic design principles established by IBM.
Be more specific of the two types you want!
IBM contributed the electronic type writer into the growth of computers
IBM mostly makes computers for business purpose and for developers.