A rational number always repeats or terminates which can be thought of as repeating zeroes.
It is a rational number because it can also be expressed as a fraction
Not.
yes, 544 is a rational number because the number can be written a over b and b is not equal to 0 and the number does not repeat itself.
a rational number repeats but terminates.ex:3.333333333. a irrational number doesn't terminate or repeat itself. ex:3.334334433444.
No, if a decimal does not terminate or repeat, it is not a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, and their decimal representation either terminates or repeats after a certain point. Decimals that do not have a pattern and continue indefinitely are considered irrational numbers.
It is a rational number.
It is rational.Any number that has a digit, or group of digits, that repeat forever is rational.
It is a rational number because it can also be expressed as a fraction
7/8 is a rational number because rational numbers are fractions, numbers that terminate, numbers that repeat.
ANY number with a finite number of decimal digits is RATIONAL.(Also, numbers with an infinite number of decimals may be rational - in which case the digits repeat - or irrational.)
Not.
2.333 is a rational number. A rational number is any number that can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, where the denominator is not zero. In this case, 2.333 can be written as 7/3, where 7 and 3 are both integers and the denominator is not zero. Thus, 2.333 is a rational number.
yes, 544 is a rational number because the number can be written a over b and b is not equal to 0 and the number does not repeat itself.
a rational number repeats but terminates.ex:3.333333333. a irrational number doesn't terminate or repeat itself. ex:3.334334433444.
No, if a decimal does not terminate or repeat, it is not a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, and their decimal representation either terminates or repeats after a certain point. Decimals that do not have a pattern and continue indefinitely are considered irrational numbers.
Decimals that terminate or repeat in some fashion are rational, while decimals that expand forever are irrational.
If the idea is to continue repeating the same pattern, then it is not a rational number, because a rational number will repeat the same digits over and over again - for example, 0.505050505... or 0.550550550550550... If there is such a repetition, it is rational; otherwise not.