True. The first statement is true and the second statement is false. In a disjunction, if either statement is true, the
disjunction is true.
It is a whole number which is another name for an integer.
A multiple of the number.
24,500 is an integer, so there's no other integer thatexpresses it any better than it already is expressed.And there's no such thing as an "interger".
given any positive integer n and any integer a , if we divide a by n, we get an integer quotient q and an integer remainder r that obey the following relationship where [x] is the largest integer less than or equal to x
The set is well defined. Whether or not a given integer belongs to the set of prime numbers is clearly defined even if, for extremely large numbers, it may prove impossible to determine the status of that number.
Given the prime factorization of an integer how can you determine if our integer is a perfect square?
yea me too dude. Mahleko :(
If your integer is "n", then the next integer will be "n+1".
The given number is a fraction. It cannot be made into an integer.
It is a whole number which is another name for an integer.
An integral multiple of the given number.
More often they are not.
The best integer to express the number 19850 is 19850.
No, there is not. Given any positive integer n, n+1 is also a positive integer and it is larger.
No. You cannot get an integer between 1.2 and 1.3
I suggest that the number which best expresses it is 29028.
The nearest integer refers to the whole number that is closest to a given number on the number line. When determining the nearest integer, you round the given number to the whole number that is closest to it. For example, if the given number is 3.6, the nearest integer would be 4 because it is closer to 3.6 than 3.