Analogical leveling is when speakers generalize amongst forms in a language--so if you have the strong verb drive-drove-driven, and you apply that form to the weak verb dive-dived-dived, you end up with some people who say dive-dove-dived. Usually it works the other way--strong verbs becoming weak--and there are other places where it appears, such as how English ended up with only one plural marker.
22 dived by-4 = 18
Analogical leveling is when speakers generalize amongst forms in a language--so if you have the strong verb drive-drove-driven, and you apply that form to the weak verb dive-dived-dived, you end up with some people who say dive-dove-dived. Usually it works the other way--strong verbs becoming weak--and there are other places where it appears, such as how English ended up with only one plural marker.
400 dived by 2 is 200 dug
Assuming that you meant divided and not dived, the answer is 0.009058 approx.
The past tense of "dive" would be "dived" or "dove".
Both "dove" and "dived" are correct past tense forms of the verb "dive." However, "dived" is more commonly used in British English, while "dove" is more commonly used in American English.
dived isn't a real word
That is one correct spelling of the past tense of to dive: dived or dove.
Dived is the past tense of dive. Dove is also acceptable.
dove No, have/has dived
The word dived is one form of the past tense of to dive, and the past participle.The other version of the past tense is dove.
Dove is the past tense of the verb dive.
Yes, the word 'dove' is a noun, a singular, common noun; a concrete noun as a word for a type of bird; an abstract noun for a person who opposes war or warlike policies. The word 'dove' is also the past tense of the verb to dive (dives, diving, dived, dove).
I dived or I have dived
Analogical leveling is when speakers generalize amongst forms in a language--so if you have the strong verb drive-drove-driven, and you apply that form to the weak verb dive-dived-dived, you end up with some people who say dive-dove-dived. Usually it works the other way--strong verbs becoming weak--and there are other places where it appears, such as how English ended up with only one plural marker.
73 dived by 16