Want this question answered?
No, it is either a verb form or a plural noun. It is the third person singular, present tense conjugation of the verb to reason. Related adjectives include reasoned and reasonable.
Since the Pythagorean theorem is named after the Greek mathematician Pythagoras, it was reasonable to assume that he is the first person to have it.
A concept is an idea or an abstraction that stands for something. A concept becomes a variable when it is made operational or when it can be counted, categorized, or observed. For example, job satisfaction is a concept, but, it becomes a variable when a definition is it attached to it that makes it measurable. You may ask a married person, "how satisfied are you with your job?" If you attach levels of satisfaction to it, then it becomes a variable. All variables are concepts when you can measure the concept. However, not all concepts can be variables. A concept that is not a variable is a concept that is not measurable.
The concept of distribution of work is about giving out work evenly to the people. Each person has their share of work and no one worker has a greater amount of work to complete than another worker.
Integers were not "found" by any specific person. They are a mathematical concept that has been studied and understood by mathematicians throughout history. The concept of integers has been developed and refined over time by many different mathematicians.
The two main standards of foreseeability are subjective (based upon what the at-fault party actually knew or understood) and objective (measured by what a reasonable person would have known under similar or the same circumstances).
The two main standards of foreseeability are subjective (based upon what the at-fault party actually knew or understood) and objective (measured by what a reasonable person would have known under similar or the same circumstances).
In law, foreseeable subjective is would be what someone literally saw or knew, and foreseeable objective would be what a reasonable person in that situation would have seen or knew about that situation.
The standard of a duty of reasonable care is determined based on what a hypothetical reasonable person would do in similar circumstances, taking into account factors such as the foreseeability of harm, the relationship between the parties, and the nature of the activity involved. Courts consider what actions would be considered reasonable and prudent under the specific circumstances of a case.
The concept of reasonable limits refers to the boundaries that are considered acceptable in a given situation based on factors such as legality, ethics, and practicality. When setting reasonable limits, it is important to balance individual freedoms with societal needs in a fair and consistent manner. These limits may vary depending on the context, such as in law enforcement, personal relationships, or workplace policies.
A person applying for American citizenship is most closely related to the concept of nationality.
Foreseeability in negligence refers to whether a reasonable person could have foreseen that their actions (or lack of action) could cause harm to another person. In terms of causation, a plaintiff must show that the harm caused was a foreseeable result of the defendant's actions in order to establish the necessary link between the defendant's conduct and the harm suffered by the plaintiff. If the harm was not foreseeable, it may be difficult to prove that the defendant's actions were the proximate cause of the injury.
What reasonable suspicion essentially means is that if a law enforcement officer believes that he or someone else is in danger he has the right to check someone for weapons. The basis is "would a reasonable person see this as a threat. If the answer is yes there are likely grounds for reasonable suspicion.
Love gives power to the person loved resulting in an empowerment of the other; Love causes a person to do things they otherwise would not do.
Foreseeability in the law of tort refers to the idea that a reasonable person could have anticipated the potential consequences of their actions. It is used to determine whether a defendant could have reasonably predicted that their actions would result in harm to another party. If harm was foreseeable, the defendant may be held liable for negligence.
It is a work environment made intolerable to a reasonable person by the frequency, severity or pervasiveness of objectionable words, actions or materials.
No, it is either a verb form or a plural noun. It is the third person singular, present tense conjugation of the verb to reason. Related adjectives include reasoned and reasonable.