In accordance with the rules laid down during the Middle Ages 1999 in Roman numerals works out as MCMXCIX but these rules were introduced centuries after the fall of the Roman Empire.
The Romans themselves would have probably calculated 1999 on a abacus counting device as MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII and by placing I to both sides of these numerals simplified them to IMM (-1+2000 = 1999)
Or alternatively they could have possibly worked out 1999 as IXCMMCX which gives a final result of IMM when positive and negative numerals are cancelled down. This method is achieved in the following manner:
1000 = M
1000+900 = CMM
1000+900+90 = XCMMC
1000+900+90+9 = IXCMMCX => IMM when cancelled down.
Both methods will give exactly the same result when converting any Hindu-Arabic numerals into Roman numerals.
The number 1999 in Roman numerals is MCMXCIX
MCMXCIX
The Roman numerals for 07-01-1999 are VII-I-MCMXCIX.
15th November, 1999 is XV. XI. MCMXCIX in Roman numerals.
it would be november,MCMXCIX
The number 1999 in Roman numerals is MCMXCIX
MCMXCIX
The Roman numerals for 07-01-1999 are VII-I-MCMXCIX.
15th November, 1999 is XV. XI. MCMXCIX in Roman numerals.
it would be november,MCMXCIX
1999 = mcmxcix mcmxcix; m = 1000, cm = 900, xc = 90, ix = 9
MIM is an incorrect way of writing 1999 in roman numerals. 1999 should be written MCMXCIX.
XIX-V-MCMXCIX
III-V-MCMXCIX
November is 11 so XI-XX-MCMXCIX
MCMXCIX EDIT: A shorter way to write it is MIM
In today's notation of Roman numerals: XII-XXVIII-MCMXCIX But during Tthe Roman era the eqivalent of 1999 was probably written out simply as IMM (2000-1)