It can't be represented by any symbol.
Another Answer:-
The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
Zero cannot be represented in Roman Numerals.
The Romans had no numeral for the value zero, so '0' could not be represented by a numeral. However in the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, introduced the numeral N (from the Latin Nulae, meaning nothing) to represent zero.
Zero does not exist in roman numerals
The Roman numerals CIC represent 199.
Roman numerals represent numbers, they do not represent words.
Zero cannot be represented in Roman Numerals.
The number zero does not have a significance in Roman numerals because the Romans did not have a symbol for zero. Roman numerals are based on a system of adding and subtracting values of different symbols to represent numbers.
The Romans had no numeral for the value zero, so '0' could not be represented by a numeral. However in the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, introduced the numeral N (from the Latin Nulae, meaning nothing) to represent zero.
Zero does not exist in roman numerals
The Roman numerals CIC represent 199.
The number "0" does not have a specific representation in Roman numerals. Roman numerals were based on a system of adding and subtracting values of different symbols, so there was no need for a symbol to represent zero.
Roman numerals represent numbers, they do not represent words.
In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent 299 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
I is the number 1 in Roman numerals.
There is no T in Roman numerals
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
In today's terms of notating Roman numerals they represent 649