Scientists use the data from an experiment to evaluate the hypothesis and draw a valid conclusion.
A valid conclusion is when your conclusion is written using the text you have and get it right.
A minimum of 6 sets of data are needed to make a valid conclusion.
You first have to come up with a hypothesis. Review the relevant work already completed out there. Design an experiment around to test your hypothesis. Conduct the experiment and analyze the results. Write a summary report. Using the data from the experiment to evaluate the hypothesis in order to draw a valid conclusions.
A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.
when he or she's conclusion is right
Draw a valid conclusion for that experiment.
Scientists use the data from an experiment to evaluate the hypothesis and draw a valid conclusion.
Scientists use the data from an experiment to evaluate the hypothesis and draw a valid conclusion.
An argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In a valid argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This can be determined by evaluating the logical structure of the argument.
Amy can assume that increasing the number of trusses increases the strength of the bridge.
The conclusions tell why the data support or reject the hypothesis.
A valid conclusion is when your conclusion is written using the text you have and get it right.
I.What types of plants were used in the experiment?II.What was the experiment's control? III.Was the experiment repeated more than once?
The Accuracy of the results.The Validity of the experiment (does it work as planned and actually reflect your question)The Repeatability. (if you - and especially others - cant repeat it then it is not valid conclusion)Possible Variables that would effect the result.
Is a conclusion about observations FROM an experiment? yes...
A minimum of 6 sets of data are needed to make a valid conclusion.