You don't need to use the distributive property.
3*17 = 51 so 30*17 = 510
Why invoke procedures that are not necessary?
No.
You can use the distributive property of multiplication to find the product. (a) 5 x 6 = 30 (b) 6 x 6 = (5 + 1) x 6 (c) 6 x 6 = 5 x 6 + 1 x 6 by the distributive property (d) 6 x 6 = 30 + 1 x 6 by substituting equation (a) (e) 6 x 6 = 30 + 6 by the identity property of multiplication (f) 6 x 6 = 36
no because distributive property is for multiple digit numbers.
No, it is not.
rddffdg
49
Some people use the distributive property to add 24 and 36, but you wouldn't use it to find the GCF which, by the way, is 12.
(7 x 10) + (7 x 4) + (7 x 0.6) = 70 + 28 + 4.2 = 102.2
One way is: 15 * 104 = 15*(100 + 4) = 15*100 + 15*4 = 1500 + 60 = 1560
according to commutative property both the distributive laws are equal why to use two distributive laws
distributive property for (11-3)=
No.
First, I would find that the GCF of 20 and 16 is 4. Then, I would divide both 20 and 16 by 4. Last, I would use the distributive property to write the sum as 4(5 + 4).
You can use the distributive property of multiplication to find the product. (a) 5 x 6 = 30 (b) 6 x 6 = (5 + 1) x 6 (c) 6 x 6 = 5 x 6 + 1 x 6 by the distributive property (d) 6 x 6 = 30 + 1 x 6 by substituting equation (a) (e) 6 x 6 = 30 + 6 by the identity property of multiplication (f) 6 x 6 = 36
no because distributive property is for multiple digit numbers.
No, it is not.
You can use the product from 4x7 to find the product of 8x7 by doubling the answer to 4x7. The product of 4x7 is 28 and the product of 8x7 is 56 (28 doubled is also 56).