Two dimensional (2D) art could be a painting, or flat image. Three dimensional (3D) art could be a statue, or embossed (raised) image.
A 3-dimensional figure. It need not be solid since it could be a curve in 3-d space.A 3-dimensional figure. It need not be solid since it could be a curve in 3-d space.A 3-dimensional figure. It need not be solid since it could be a curve in 3-d space.A 3-dimensional figure. It need not be solid since it could be a curve in 3-d space.
It could be a pyramid.
A polygon is a 2-dimensional shape whereas a hexahedron is 3-dimensional. Therefore a polygon that is a hexahedron could by called a geometric impossibility.
There is no equivalence. A linear yard is a measure of length or distance in 1-dimensional space while a square metre is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid. In the case of the material being measured in linear yards, the width is a constant that is implicitly known to those using the measure. It could, for example, be the standard width of fabric, or rolls or paper.
No. According to the basic laws of dimensional analysis such a conversion is not valid. If it were valid, then you could figure out how many acres you walk to school.
No. A square foot is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. 30 feet is a measure of distance in 1-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to the basic rules of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid without additional information.
1 in = 2.54 cmFormulain x 2.54 = cm You could use some grammar lessons.Algebraic Steps / Dimensional Analysis Formula1 in* 2.54 cm1 in=2.54 cm
A sphere could be used as a three dimensional model of the earth.
Two dimensional (2D) art could be a painting, or flat image. Three dimensional (3D) art could be a statue, or embossed (raised) image.
why risk analysis done
This question cannot be answered because:there is no such unit as a milometre. Unfortunately, it could be a typo for either kilometre or millimetre - two measures which differ by a factor of a million!the area of a square cannot be either of these because both are 1-dimensional measures of length. Area is a 2-dimensional concept and according to basic rules of dimensional analysis conversion from one to the other is not valid.
Discussion could be debate, or analysis. Further consideration could also be analysis, or could simply be thought.
It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.It would depend on what kind of analysis you are doing. You could use any of the charts for scientific analysis, not just one particular chart.
A 3-dimensional figure. It need not be solid since it could be a curve in 3-d space.A 3-dimensional figure. It need not be solid since it could be a curve in 3-d space.A 3-dimensional figure. It need not be solid since it could be a curve in 3-d space.A 3-dimensional figure. It need not be solid since it could be a curve in 3-d space.
Depending on the context the answer could be a net or a projection.Depending on the context the answer could be a net or a projection.Depending on the context the answer could be a net or a projection.Depending on the context the answer could be a net or a projection.
None, since there can be no conversion. A foot is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space while a square foot is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different characteristics and, according to the most basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at comparisons or conversions between the two are fundamentally flawed.