Since it's rectangular, you simply need to multiply the length, width, and height.
This will give you the volume.
I guess you know what a centimeter looks like, and what 10 centimeters look like.
Personally, I would probably use my hand, and check how many times the distance between my thumb and index fits on the box, since it's about 15 centimeters. Either that, or the width of my thumb, which is about 2 centimeters.
But with the thumb you're going to be spending a while, so you might as well take the 1 minute and go look through your stuff to find your measuring tape.
I think that approximations are very easy to do though, so you don't even need that. Just say that the box has about 50 centimeters in height, 30 centimeters in length, and 10 centimeters in width.
So that gives you 15000 centimeters cube, which sounds very close to the actual volume.
Yes there could be any cubic measurement for volume Yes.
Yes, Cubic Centimeters or (cc) is one way of measuring volume. However it isn't the only means of measuring volume. You could conceivably measure volume in terms of any unit used to describe linear distance (i.e.inch,meters,millimeters....)
The volume doesn't tell you the dimensions or the area of the sides.The smallest area it could have is 129.266 square cm, but it could beany number greater than that.
In terms of fluid capacity, a shape with a volume of 4,000 cm3 could hold up to about 1.056 US gallons.
No,You are confusing volume measurements with area measurements.You could ask could 3- cubic centimeters of a liquid disperse to cover an area of 225 square centimeters. This then is a science question that deals with the properties of the liquid and the surface in question.
Yes there could be any cubic measurement for volume Yes.
You could measure volume in cubic centimeters.
Cereal could be weighed on scales, or on a weighbridge while still on the lorry, or measured by volume as in so many sacks.
Yes, Cubic Centimeters or (cc) is one way of measuring volume. However it isn't the only means of measuring volume. You could conceivably measure volume in terms of any unit used to describe linear distance (i.e.inch,meters,millimeters....)
The volume doesn't tell you the dimensions or the area of the sides.The smallest area it could have is 129.266 square cm, but it could beany number greater than that.
Cubic meters, liters, cubic centimeters, depending on the amount of liquid.
It could be any positive number of centimeters. The volume depends not only on the radius, but also on the height of the cylinder.
Not always in cubic centimeters. It could be in cubic meters, liters, and so forth.
A good non-metric estimate for the volume of a kitchen sink could be in terms of gallons. Typically, a standard kitchen sink has a volume of around 8-10 gallons.
In terms of fluid capacity, a shape with a volume of 4,000 cm3 could hold up to about 1.056 US gallons.
No,You are confusing volume measurements with area measurements.You could ask could 3- cubic centimeters of a liquid disperse to cover an area of 225 square centimeters. This then is a science question that deals with the properties of the liquid and the surface in question.
Yes, cereal does not contain meat.